Home>Top Issues

Zamir Ahmed Awan: Political hit for the Sino-US trade war

Monday,Jul 16, 2018

Very strange. The champions of globalization and advocates of trade liberalizations for over a century are now launching a trade war against China. The recent decision of President Trump’s office to impose tariffs worth over 50 billion US dollars on imports from China will have devastating effects on both sides.

It was the West who established the international economic organization, the World Trade Organization (WTO), to regulate the trade in goods, services and intellectual property by providing a framework for trade agreements and dispute resolution with the focus to liberalize trade and remove all possible trade barriers.

The WTO replaced the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was a legal agreement between countries to promote free and fair trade worldwide.

The West was striving hard to open domestic markets for imports and to reduce import tariffs, and the WTO has been successful to a great extent in delivering significant trade liberalization as compared to the era before it was established.

Although there are clauses regarding dumping and anti-dumping, as well as places for negotiations in case of any disputes under the WTO regime, waging a trade war is an unfair practice.

The world is still trapped in many other issues like the Syrian war, Afghanistan, the Iran nuclear issue, Korean Peninsula, etc., so a new trade war in such a situation will be a disaster.

Syrian soldiers at a checkpoint watch Syrian opposition fighters during an evacuation of the city of Daraa on July 15, 2018. /VCG Photo


China, as per my understanding, will never initiate any aggressive step as it is not in Chinese philosophy to generate new problems. They believe in resolving issues through peaceful negotiation.

China has a successful record of resolving many complex issues in the past. It is also playing a significant role in settlement of some international issues, like those of Israel-Palestine, Korean Peninsula, Ukraine, Syria, etc. Likewise, China will use its soft power to resolve the trade war with the US.

Donald Trump’s tariffs will trigger consequences against the US in the WTO and may even lead to its collapse, which would lead to an escalation of tariffs against US exports.

Furthermore, the political systems between the two countries are very different and the social impact of any trade war on both countries will be even more different.

In China, steel and aluminum industry is mostly owned by the state, and the Chinese government has sufficient resources to compensate for any losses in steel or aluminum manufacturing.

But in the US, the steel and aluminum industry is the hands of the private sector. If they suffer any financial losses, they will exert pressure on the US administration and will create a lot of political unrest, which may lead to defeat in the mid-terms for the ruling party or the president.

According to US-China Business Council, exports to China either directly or indirectly supported 1.8 million new US jobs in 2015, so the domestic situation in the US may become even worse due to the trade war.

I hope that US Congress, think tanks and all stakeholders will join hands and come up with an appropriate solution to it before it is too late, as the American political system is relatively mature with checks and balances. I hope the situation may be controlled well before the point of no return. It is in nobody’s interest to wage a trade war. If it escalates, it will be not limited to China-US but will engulf the whole world. 

About Author 

Zamir Ahmed Awan is a senior fellow with Center for China and Globalization(CCG) and a sinologist at the National University of Sciences and Technology.


From CGTN,2018-7-16

  • Cui Fan: Negotiations still best way to end disputes

    The latest US investigation into China’s intellectual property policies and practices under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 is not the first of its kind. But the US has rarely used Section 301 against China after the latter’s accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001, because the WTO mechanism offers a fairer, more comprehensive solution to bilateral trade disputes.

  • Chinese mainland sees huge deficit between inbound and outbound

    Outbound tourism from the Chinese mainland has grown at an incredible rate since 2005, far outpacing the growth of inbound tourism, a report from think tank Center for China & Globalization (CCG) and travel giant Ctrip group revealed on July 5th.

  • Skilled Immigrants Are Starting to Choose China Over U.S.

    In March, the Chinese search engine company Baidu set out on its first overseas college recruitment tour, which included visits to some of California’s top-tier tech schools like UC Berkeley, Stanford, and USC.

  • 【Global Times】China won’t change course in trash import ban

    China will firmly carry out the ban on imports of such items as waste plastic and paper, and the claim that this policy breaches WTO obligations is groundless, industry representatives told the Global Times on Monday.

  • Beijing’s patience tested by comment from Ross

    He Weiwen, deputy director of the Beijing-based Center for China and Globalization (CCG) and a former diplomat, said China faced challenges in treating foreign companies fairly and it would take time to restore their confidence.