From: Bloomberg News
The U.S. said it would seek to impose duties on imports of aluminum foil from China, arguing that state subsidies for the domestic industry unfairly disadvantage American producers.
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross announced the “affirmative preliminary determination” late Tuesday in Washington following an investigation into the practices of Chinese makers of the material. Subsidies of as much as 81 percent were found to be in place, according to a fact sheet released on the department’s website.
If carried through, the duties could ratchet up trade tension between the world’s two largest economies, as Trump administration efforts to shrink the trade deficit with China have borne little fruit. President Donald Trump is considering a formal investigation into China’s alleged intellectual property abuse and his administration is scrutinizing imports of steel and aluminum on national security grounds. Tuesday’s decision is unrelated to that probe.
“The United States is committed to free, fair and reciprocal trade, and will continue to validate the information provided to us that brought us to this decision,” Ross said in the statement. “The Trump administration will not stand idly by as harmful trade practices from foreign nations attempt to take advantage of our essential industries, workers, and businesses.”
The decision is still to be confirmed by a final department ruling by October and a determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be instructed to collect cash deposits based on the preliminary rates for aluminum foil being imported.
“Aluminum has become a hot spot in China-U.S. trade in recent years, as Chinese output of aluminum products has surged a lot, and its exports increased very fast, which has raised eyebrows from trading partners,” said Yang Rongzhen, a professor at the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. “This is just one of several cases the U.S. has launched, but it is still within the normal trade frictions. I wouldn’t say this is a trade war.”
In January, the U.S. filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization alleging Chinese subsidies to domestic aluminum producers are suppressing global prices of the metal.
The U.S. aluminum foil production industry accounts for $6.8 billion in economic activity annually, the Aluminum Association, a trade group, said in a statement it released in support of the Commerce Department findings.
U.S. production accounts for 69 percent of all domestic aluminum foil demand, down from about 84 percent 12 years ago, the Arlington, Virginia-based group said. During the same period, Chinese imports grew from essentially zero to 22 percent of the total U.S. aluminum foil market market today, it said.
Five companies were singled out in the report, which found effective subsidy rates ranging from 16.56 percent in the case of Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co. and 28.33 percent with Dingsheng Aluminum Industries Trading Co., to 80.97 percent atLoften Aluminium Ltd., Manakin Industries LLC and Suzhou Manakin Aluminum Processing Technology Co.
Chen Hong, founder of Suzhou Manakin in Jiangsu province, said by telephone that he’s disappointed with the findings and is talking with U.S. lawyers about his options, adding that he’s not optimistic the decision can be overturned. If levied, the duties would hurt the U.S. packaging industry and costs would be passed on to U.S. consumers, he said.
An employee who answered the phone at Dingsheng Aluminum said executives weren’t available and that she couldn’t comment on the issue. Zhongji Lamination, Loften Aluminium and Manakin Industries didn’t respond to requests for comment or weren’t reachable.
“Trade frictions between China and the U.S. have been frequent, and will remain in the future,” said He Weiwen, a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization(CCG) in Beijing and a former economic and commercial counselor at Chinese consulates in New York and San Francisco. “But there’s still not a full-fledged trade war. The spats over specific products, however, are going to be represented in more complicated ways.”
From Bloomberg News, 2017-8-9
The CCG’s ‘track-II’ diplomacy in America (XII) – The CCG team visited the Heritage Foundation, the conservative party’s most important think tank
Lastly, the Center for China and Globalization (CCG) team arrived at its final stop, the famous think tank of the Trump administration – the Heritage Foundation. During the visit, CCG shared its views with Dr. Feulner on the relations between China and America, the cooperation of the two countries on infrastructure construction, China’s investment in America and the cultural exchange between the two countries.
The CCG’s ‘track-II’ diplomacy in America (XI) -– CCG visited the biggest think tank of the Democratic Party, American Center for Progress
Recently, the team of Center for China and Globalization (CCG) visited the think tank of the Democratic Party, Center for American Progress. During the visit, the team exchanged opinions with Andy Green, the Head of Economic Policy Research, and Brian Harding, the Head of Asia and Southeast Asia Study on issues such as China-U.S. relations, the two countries’ cooperation on infrastructure construction, the cooperation and development of think tanks, etc.
The CCG’s ‘track-II’ diplomacy in America (X) – Cooperating with Migration Policy Institute in studying international migration and talents
At the beginning of October, the team from Center for China and Globalization (CCG) held a meeting with the Migration Policy Institute. The Migration Policy Institute is the pioneering think tank of migration study in America.