Home>Expert Views

Trump needs cooperation for success

Monday,Jan 22, 2018

 

5a6561afa3106e7d2d6fb329

President Xi Jinping holds a grand ceremony to welcome US President Donald Trump at the square outside the East Gate of the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. [Photo/Xinhua]


Editor’s Note: US President Donald Trump’s China policy has been inconsistent and unstable. So how do we evaluate Sino-US ties, especially after the US National Security Strategy report called China a "strategic competitor", instead of a competitor and partner, in December?


Uncalled-for haste the bane of Trump

The US administration has always needed a "rival power" to put all the blames on, and win the support of the people and Congress at home, and its allies overseas. After the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, successive US administrations have targeted China. But they also said China and the US are vital competitors and partners, and both sides chose to focus more on cooperation and common benefits. But Trump is not one to play by the rules. He has used his National Security Strategy report to label China a "competitor ", because he wants closer vigilance on a rising China.

Trump’s security strategy report, however, may not be as effective in practice, because some of his strategic decisions and goals are distorted and almost impossible to implement.

When the Trump-led US turned its back on its international obligations and commitments by withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement and the 2015 Paris climate agreement, it actually compromised its global leadership role and created an atmosphere for other world powers to work for the betterment of the world. China took up that role, expanding its global engagement and playing a more important part in helping improve global governance. Therefore, Trump’s fickle policies and instinctive decisions are to blame for weakening the US’ relations not only with China, but also with its European allies.

But the sooner Trump realizes that the US cannot avoid cooperating with China if it wants to strengthen the US economy the better.

 

About Author 
陶短房 小图g (1)

Tao Duanfang, a researcher at the Center for China and Globalization(CCG).

 

From China Daily,2018-1-22

 

  • 【Financial Times】China’s immigration and aid agencies a sign of global aspiration

    Two new government agencies were created at the meeting of China’s National People’s Congress earlier this month. The State Immigration Administration and the International Development and Cooperation Agency each in its own way signifies Beijing’s endeavour to provide institutional support for China’s expanding global role.

  • 【China Watch】 | 10 suggestions on Sino-US trade friction

    Since the United States imposed tariffs on Chinese goods on July 6, 2018, the bilateral trade friction has been escalating, affecting the prosperity of the global economy. Against this backdrop, the Center for China and Globalization (CCG), a think tank headquartered in Beijing, issued the analysis report “Understanding the Sino-US Trade War: Analyses and Recommendations”on July 24, 2018.

  • He Weiwen: Dialogue works better than threat on IP issues

    The United States has launched an investigation to determine whether China has indulged in “forced transfer of American technologies and theft of American intellectual property”. US President Donald Trump has termed it “a very big move”. And he is right. It indeed is a big move-backwards.

  • One Belt, One Road: China heralds ’Digital Silk Road’

    Cybertechnology leaders from around the world gather in China for an annual internet conference, but two key elements of this years event — the establishment of Beijing’s Digital Silk Road and the attendance of American technology trailblazers — mark a potential shift in global digital power dynamics.

  • Premier calls for insightful and targeted suggestions from top advisers

    Premier Li Keqiang called on Wednesday for top advisers to contribute thoughts and suggestions on how to improve the government’s policymaking.