Home>Top Issues

China should focus on mid- to long-term effects with the UK

Wednesday,Jul 20, 2016

From: Global Times

 

Cui Hongjian, director of the Department of European Studies, China Institute of International Studies, speeches at a monthly luncheon held by the Center for China and Globalization(CCG).

The stunning UK referendum result to leave the EU is widely considered to be a black swan event that nobody saw coming.

Following the Brexit incident, there are certain reflections to consider, one being the subsequent development of a post-EU Britain. The focus should be primarily on effects stemming from the Leave vote and on whether the new Government will continue the policies of the UK’s former Prime Minister David Cameron’s cabinet at home and abroad.

British economic performance has been successful under Cameron’s leadership. The country has maintained a higher degree of openness than that of other EU members in terms of supporting investment and trade liberalization, which has been an important factor in why the British economy has stood out among its EU members in recent years. In this regard, we hope the UK’s power elite will be wise to continue in this direction towards globalization.

But short-term financial uncertainties in the EU as a result of the referendum vote are expected to persist, including the unknown timeframe of when the UK will invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, which sets out the framework for a member country to formally notify the EU of its decision to leave the bloc and marks the start of a two-year withdrawal period. From the market perspective, the earlier the UK triggers Article 50, the better, as uncertainties carried by the decision will be able to be resolved. Also, the UK will be in a disadvantageous position as the 27 remaining EU members will set the parameters of Britain’s position in relation to the EU, which may be why Britain is reluctant to rush to be in that situation.

When it comes to the Brexit effect on China, the impact brought by the UK’s decision to withdraw is substantially lower compared to other countries. Firstly, China should focus more on the mid- to long-term effects, such as how the British government will direct its policy, and how the government will handle the future UK-EU relations. For instance, some Chinese enterprises and investment entered the British market before the referendum when companies had access to the EU single market. At this stage, it is crucial to see what kind of relations the UK will form with the EU, as that will greatly determines whether Chinese capital can be directed to the EU via Britain, to what degree such methods will be hindered, and how much extra costs will be incurred.

Secondly, China should plan for changes to their own relations with the UK, including the possibility of a China-UK free trade agreement (FTA), although this will not take place until Britain officially withdraws from the EU. But certain preparations could be made beforehand and negotiations on recognizing China’s market economy status can also be put on the table during future China-UK talks.

The article was complied by Global Times reporter Wang Wei based on a recent speech by Cui Hongjian, director of the Department of European Studies, China Institute of International Studies, at a monthly luncheon held by the Center for China and Globalization(CCG).

From Global Times,2016-7-18

  • 【CGTN】 China’s economic opening-up

    Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Ban Ki-moon, the newly elected chairman of the Boao Forum for Asia. Xi spoke of the importance of maintaining the global multilateral system. Could China lead by example and encourage others to join the…

  • One Belt, One Road: China heralds ’Digital Silk Road’

    Cybertechnology leaders from around the world gather in China for an annual internet conference, but two key elements of this years event — the establishment of Beijing’s Digital Silk Road and the attendance of American technology trailblazers — mark a potential shift in global digital power dynamics.

  • 【China Daily】Beijing, Washington eye fresh talks

    China and the United States discussed a road map on Tuesday for the next stage of trade talks during a phone conversation between Vice-Premier Liu He, US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.

  • Real economy VS. Virtual Economy

    In China, there is a big debate going on about the real economy and the virtual economy. Some say the real economy is shrinking because of the expansion of the digital economy, and even ask for more supervision of online operations by the government; those in the virtual economy argue that the lack of innovation and reform is what’s hurting the real economy. China’s Primer Li Keqiang has said, these economies need to be combined to promote the economic development in China, but high costs in the real economy remain an issue. Finding the way to get the balance right is an ongoing challenge.

  • Foreign trade and economic officials visit CCG for multilateral trade system discussion

    On Oct. 17, the Center for China and Globalization hosted at its headquarters a group of foreign government officials for trade and economic affairs led by New Zealand Vice Minister of Trade and Economy Vangelis Vitalis and held a discussion about the prospect of the Cross-Pacific Trade Partnership Pact and the agenda for the modernization of multilateral trade system.